Legal Opinion

Galeano v. Glazer Aluminum

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1996No. 95-CA-33Published

1Opinion of the Court

I2CANNELLA, Judge.

Plaintiff, Jorge A. Galeano, appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant, Glazer Steel and Aluminum (Glazer), dismissing his claim for worker’s compensation benefits upon finding that his heart attack is not compensable under the Workers’ Compensation law. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

Plaintiff was an employee at Glazer on August 5,1991, when he suffered chest pains which later were determined to be from a heart attack. Plaintiff was employed in a janitorial position at the time of his heart attack and had held that position for about six months prior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Harold v. La Belle Maison ApartmentsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Charles v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Hunt v. Milton J. Womack, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API