Legal Opinion

A.A. v. Eskenazi Health/Midtown CMHC

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case No. 49A02-1610-MH-2286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Judge.

A.A. was involuntarily committed to Eskenazi Health/Midtown Community Mental Health Clinic (“Eskenazi”). He was not present at the commitment hearing. A.A. appeals, arguing that he did not validly waive his right to personally appear at his commitment hearing, and that he had a due process and a statutory right to be present. Eskenazi Health argues that the trial court had independent statutory authority to waive A.A.’s right to be present at the commitment hearing, and that A.A.’s presence at the commitment hearing would have been dangerous to AA. and others at the hearing. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morton v. IvacicIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Commitment of A.L. v. Wishard Health Services, Midtown Community Mental Health CenterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Cheek v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. In the Matter of the Commitment of M.E. v. Department of Veterans AffairsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A.A. v. Eskenazi Health/Midtown CMHCIndiana Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API