Application of Anthony Sabatino and Daniel Orlando
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 27-29, 33-35, 38, 41, 42, 44-48 and 54 in appellants’ application 1 for “Storage Battery Construction and Method of Making Same” as obvious in view of certain prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Claims 42 and 48 have been withdrawn from appeal.
The invention relates in general to a method of making an internal electrical connection between a group of plates of positive polarity in one cell of a storage battery and a group of plates of negative polarity in an adjacent cell. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Jack E. CaveneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re SabatinoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973