Legal Opinion

Application of Anthony Sabatino and Daniel Orlando

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 27-29, 33-35, 38, 41, 42, 44-48 and 54 in appellants’ application 1 for “Storage Battery Construction and Method of Making Same” as obvious in view of certain prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Claims 42 and 48 have been withdrawn from appeal.

The invention relates in general to a method of making an internal electrical connection between a group of plates of positive polarity in one cell of a storage battery and a group of plates of negative polarity in an adjacent cell. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of Jack E. CaveneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. In re SabatinoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API