Kurtz v. Jelleff
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of the city and town of Eipon: J. "W. Hall, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Gassodat, 0. J.
This is an action to recover $131.24, money had and received. The answer interposes two counterclaims, one for $25 for services rendered, and the other for $75, the alleged agreed price for procuring a purchaser for certain real estate. The plaintiff, replied, putting in issue both counterclaims. A jury having been waived and trial had, the court found that the. defendant was entitled to the $25 alleged in the first counterclaim, but that the second counterclaim, for $75, had not been proved, and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the $131.24, less the $25; that is to…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Merrill Railway & Lighting Co. v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Hahn v. Walworth CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Ritchie v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Armory Realty Co. v. OlsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.