Legal Opinion

C. Tennant Sons & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 31, 1962No. C.D. 2368Published

1Opinion of the Court

LawRENCE, Judge:

An importation described on the invoice as “Seamless Rectangular Hollow Sections” was classified by the collector of customs as “Finished or unfinished iron or steel tubes nspf: other,” in paragraph 328 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 328), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 10% per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims that said merchandise should 'be classified in paragraph 312 of said act (19 U.S.C. §1001, par.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. United States v. SehlbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API