Legal Opinion
LAPENSOHN v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 2021No. 2:19-cv-04576Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HOWARD C. LAPENSOHN, et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 19-4576-KSM v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. April 21, 2021 This case is one of many similar cases brought by Plaintiffs’ counsel, Attorney Joshua Thomas. In each case, a mortgagor bank foreclosed on the plaintiff’s home after many months, and in some cases, years, of nonpayment.1 When the plaintiff’s challenges to foreclosure failed in state court, Mr. Thomas filed a federal case on the relevant homeowner’s behalf,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Kathleen Buck v. The Hampton Township School District Lawrence C. Korchnak, DrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.