Legal Opinion

Schlesinger v. Jud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Samuel Schlesinger, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor'of the defendant, rendered on the 13th day of February, 1901, upon the decision of the court dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirsohberg, J.:

The complaint alleges that the action' is' for commissions on sale -of real estate. The defendant demanded a bill of particulars, which was duly furnished, and which states that the plaintiff’s claim is for negotiating as broker with A. Roth, of whose share of the commission he has received an assignment, the exchange of the defendant’s realty No. 164 McKibben St., Brooklyn, fór real estate owned by Ullrich Maurer in Way Av., Jamaica, Queens Co., during or about Nov., 1900.” On the trial the plaintiff gave testimony tending to show that the defendant had placed his property for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scofield v. . HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Vitelli v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carow v. BishopDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Bass v. Phœnix Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Johnson v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Larkins v. McGinleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  5. Weisberger v. MartinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API