Legal Opinion

A. Ellinger & Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1902No. 12,138PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Lyon district court; W. A. Randolph, judge. In banc.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J.:

This case presents another phase of the homestead-exemption claim. The defendant in error, M. Thomas, is the owner of a house and lot. It had been occupied by him and his family as a resi*181dence, and, of course, while so occupied, was a homestead and exempt from the demands of creditors. He still occupies it as a residence, but his wife is dead, their children have grown to maturity, have removed from the -homestead, are engaged in vocations for themselves, and are nowise dependent on him, nor is any one else associated with him in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashton v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Chambers v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Battey v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Farlin v. SookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Shirack v. ShirackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cross v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Weaver v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Towle v. TowleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API