Legal Opinion
Peregoy v. Amoco Production Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 24, 1990No. Civ. A. No. B-89-0423-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
COBB, District Judge.
All the defendants in this case have moved for the imposition of sanctions upon the plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel under FED.R.CIV.P. 11 (Rule ll).1 This court has reviewed the motions and memoranda submitted, and heard oral argument upon the question.
The Fifth Circuit has provided this court with basic guidelines to follow in determining whether to impose sanctions under Rule 11. See Thomas v. Capital Security Systems, Inc., 836 F.2d 866 (5th Cir.1988). This court is to measure compliance with Rule 11 under an objective, not subjective, standard.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- M. T. Humphries v. Texas Gulf Sulphur CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Eura Mae Higginbotham Green v. The Texas Gulf Sulphur CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Rosa Ella Graham Beasley v. W. P. H. McFaddin Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Foster v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meadows v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992