The Jordan and Skaneateles Plankroad Company v. . Morley
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
There is no force in the objection that a formal promise by the defendant to pay the amount alleged to be due from him for tolls, is not stated in the complaint. In pleading under the Code, it is sufficient to state the facts from which the law infers a liability, or implies a promise. If the defendant is legally liable for these tolls on account of having used the road, an action of debt would have lain at common law upon a statement of the facts creating the liability, without the averment of a promise.
The only question of any moment in this case is, whether the remedy given by the statute…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Almy v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1809
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Grossman v. . SchenkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hamilton v. WinterrowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- School District No. 12 v. Pondera CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Southern Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.