Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Allen v. Wexford of Indiana LLC

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided November 7, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00047Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION DANIEL ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-47-JD-MGG WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Daniel Allen, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API