Legal Opinion

People v. Fullan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

The dispositive issue is whether attempted kidnapping in the first degree is a cognizable crime in the circumstances of this case under the governing statutes and precedents (Penal Law § 135.25 [3]; § 110.00; People v Miller, 87 NY2d 211 [1995]; cf., People v Campbell, 72 NY2d 602 [1988]). The Appellate Division held, as a matter of law, that the crime was not cognizable, citing only Campbell. A Judge of this Court granted leave to appeal to the People, and to the defendant on a discrete issue that ultimately is subsúmed in the decision on the People’s appeal.

W…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. EsquilinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. FullanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PrescottNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. FingallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. PrescottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. FullanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re Kaminski G.New York City Family Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API