Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 13, 1994No. 1-92-4384PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Following a bench trial, defendant Arthur Smith was found guilty of aggravated criminal sexual assault, criminal sexual assault, and robbery. This court affirmed his conviction on appeal. Defendant filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief; the circuit court dismissed the petition, finding it to be without merit. Defendant appeals that dismissal, raising the issue of whether the court erred in dismissing his post-conviction petition.

In February 1987, defendant was charged with criminal sexual assault, aggravated criminal sexual assault, and robbery, for acts alleged to have occurred…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Melvin H. Sullivan v. James A. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. People v. OwensIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Carl William Montgomery v. Dale PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. People v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. DavisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People v. HernandezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API