Legal Opinion

King v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1918No. 9441PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to amend decree; from Muscogee superior court—Judge Howard. March 1, 19Í7.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. A judgment may be amended by order of the court, to make it conform to the verdict upon which it is predicated (Civil Code of 1910, § 5697) ; and such an amendment may be made after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was entered (Irby v. Brown, 59 Ga. 597); though it is otherwise as to tl\e amendment of a judgment on the merits of a cause, where it is sought to amend after adjournment of such term, by reason of facts or conditions subsequently occurring. Richards v. McHan, 139 Ga. 37 (76 S. E. 382). “The rule has always been recognized in this State that a judgment may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richards v. McHanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Rucker v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Scarborough v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Dennis v. ColleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. King v. RodgersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burns v. FEDCO MANAGEMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API