Cothran v. Rock Hill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
StukES, J.:
It was necessary to fully consider this action for the purpose of the decision of the appeals in City of Rock Hill et al. v. Cothran et al., 209 S. C. 357, 40 S. E. (2d) 239, and it was analyzed in the opinion there rendered. Our conclusion was that the case instituted by the City of Rock Hill be dismissed and that the present action proceed for the purpose of determining the damages allegedly suffered by plaintiffs by reason of the closing of a section of a street adjacent to their premises. Eor a full understanding of the controversy now at hand reference may be had to the cited…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Rock Hill v. CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- MacK Manufacturing Co. v. Mass. Bonding & Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Ancrum v. Camden Water, Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Batson v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Houston v. Town of West GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stokes v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Bob Hammond Construction Co. v. Banks Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Simons v. Tri-State Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Touchberry v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- United States v. Chester Heights AssociatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.