Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chadrow v. Kellman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1954No. Appeal, 151Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bell:

Jennie Kellman, a niece of the decedent (William Chadrow), claims the contents of a safe deposit box, namely, $3180. in cash, of which box she and the decedent were joint owners with right of survivorship. Irrespective of whether the principles governing an inter vivos gift are applied, or whether the principles of contract law are applied (as I am convinced they should be), Jennie is and from June 21, 1951, the date of the gift or contract, undoubtedly was a joint owner of the contents of the box with right of survivorship.

The auditing Judge found the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cochrane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Furjanick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Noonan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Mardis, Administratrix v. SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API