Legal Opinion

State v. Hibdon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1978No. 75-1364, CA 8950, No. 75-1363, CA 8976, No. 75-1052, CA 8985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction on three separate indictments for armed robbery of three stores in Eugene and Springfield, all of which have been consolidated for this appeal. Two errors are assigned: (1) the failure of the trial courts to suppress inculpatory statements made by defendant, and (2) the denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the three indictments because the state did not comply with the Interstate Compact on Detainers.

I

Defendant was apprehended in the course of an armed robbery on March 3, 1975, in Kent, Washington. He was advised of his Miranda1 rights prior to any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SchwensenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. State v. DeMotteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. AldereteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. AldereteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API