In re Fish
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentHarvey, J.
We respectfully dissent. It is the strong public policy of this State not to lightly set aside a decedent’s last will (Rohan, 1986 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 17B, EPTL 3-1.1 [1988 Pocket Part], at 29). Decedent’s will was duly executed, acknowledged and attested to by two subscribing witnesses. Prior to executing the will, a medical doctor performed a "mental status” examination on decedent. The doctor testified at trial that decedent performed the test satisfactorily. The attorney who drafted the will, who could have knowingly testified as to whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Estate of KumstarNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re the Estate of SladeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In Re Proving the Will of DelmarNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.