Legal Opinion

In Re Proving the Will of Gaffken

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1922PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 10, 1921, admitting to probate the will of Arthur H. Gaffken, deceased, subject to the rights of testator’s son born after the making of said will. On June 12, 1914, testator made the will probated, in which he gave one-third of his estate to Mary Louise Krom, and the remaining two-thirds to his mother, Adelheid Gaffken, and appointed executors.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 10, 1921, admitting to probate the will of Arthur H. Gaffken, deceased, subject to the rights of testator’s son born after the making of said will. On June 12, 1914, testator made the will probated, in which he gave one-third of his estate to Mary Louise Krom, and the remaining two-thirds to his mother, Adelheid Gaffken, and appointed executors. On June fourteenth he married Mary Louise Krom, to whom on February 3, 1916, was born a son.. Testator died December…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. In re the Estate of QuickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re the Last Will & Testament of ScolpinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. In re the Estate of HertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API