Legal Opinion

Automobile Equipment Co. v. Motor Bankers Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1930No. Docket No. 12, Calendar No. 34,772PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendant Community Motors, Incorporated, was engaged in the business of selling at retail new Nash automobiles. Its salesroom in Detroit was rented from defendant Samuel J. Schoneman and another. The dealer was in arrears for rent near $650 or more. To secure the rent, the dealer gave to Schoneman a purchase agreement covering a new car, and it was agreed that the car remain on the floor of the dealer’s salesroom. Concededly this agreement was in the nature of a mortgage. It was not filed of record. The dealer was indebted to plaintiff $733.26 for merchandise. Plaintiff pressed for payment,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kohl v. LynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Dixon v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Schloss v. FeltusMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McGraw v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. First Security Bank (In Re Williams Bros. Asphalt Paving Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  2. M. B. Thomas Auto Sales, Inc. v. PickleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Metro Plan, Inc. v. Kotcher-Turner, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API