People v. Wells
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of New York, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the' office of the clerk of the county of Oneida on the 11th day of .January, 1900, upon the decision of the -court, rendered after a trial at the Herkimer Special Term, sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, with notice of an intention" - tó bring up for review upon such appeal the order upon which said…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of New York, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the' office of the clerk of the county of Oneida on the 11th day of .January, 1900, upon the decision of the -court, rendered after a trial at the Herkimer Special Term, sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, with notice of an intention" - tó bring up for review upon such appeal the order upon which said judgment was entered.
1Opinion of the Court
McLennan, J.:
Concededly two distinct causes of action against the defendants, are set forth in the complaint. One cause of action “ for penalties incurred under the fisheries, game and forest law,” specified in subdivision 10 of section 484 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and, given to the plaintiff by section 280 of chapter 31 of the General Laws (the Fisheries, Game and Forest Law) (Laws of 1892, chap. 488, as. amd. by Laws of 1895, chap. 395, and by Laws of 1896, chap. 114),. which provides as follows: “ The board of fisheries, game and forest may bring, in the name of the people of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- De Wolfe v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lyman v. Rochester Title InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Howe v. PeckhamNew York Supreme Court · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Felt City Townsite Co. v. Felt Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- McInerney v. MainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Ohman v. City of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
- People v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1907
- Drexel v. HollanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.