Legal Opinion
State Highway Department v. Musgrove
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 30, 1965No. 41477PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. Under the authority of headnote 1 of State Hwy. Dept. v. Rutland, ante, the charges complained of in ground 4 of the motion for new trial were error..
2. It is not necessary, in view of the reversal under Division 1, that this court pass upon the alleged error in charging that the jury should find a fair and reasonable value of the property taken rather than market value. State Highway Department v. Rutland, 112 Ga. App. ante, headnote 2.
3. At the beginning of the brief of evidence appears to be a stipulation entered into at a pre-trial conference or at least prior to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- State Highway Board v. ShierlingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Watkins Co. v. SeawrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- GARDEN PARKS, INCORPORATED v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Noble v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- DeKalb County v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- State Highway Department v. CronicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Department v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965