Legal Opinion

IncredibleBank v. Bloomquist (TV2)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 25, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00041Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE INCREDIBLEBANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 2:21-CV-41-TAV-CRW ) SCOTT D. BLOOMQUIST, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 11]. Defendant has not responded, and the time for doing so has long passed. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 7.1(a). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. 11] will be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND In its complaint, plaintiff alleged that, on or about August 25, 2017, it loaned $746,114.14 to Planet…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Kevin W. Ziegler v. Ibp Hog Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Barany-Snyder v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Southern Ohio Bank, Under the Will of Virgil A. Diperna, Deceased v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  5. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API