Legal Opinion

Transport of New Jersey v. Watler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 10, 1979PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Botter’s opinion, subject to the following comments. Transport of New Jersey (TNJ), as a self-insurer, is not a “qualified person” under N. J. 8. A. 39 :6 — 63 and thus is not entitled to recover from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Eund. The certificate of self-insurance issued to TNJ pursuant to N. J. 8. A. 39:6" — 53 is a “policy” under which TNJ is insured for purposes of N. J. S. A. 39:6-62. Incorporated within this “policy” of self-insurance is the uninsured motorist coverage required of all motor vehicle insurance policies by N.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Comorote v. MASSEYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  2. Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Am. Nurses Ass'n v. Passaic Gen. Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Ryder/P.I.E. Nationwide, Inc. v. Harbor Bay Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Ross v. Transport of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API