Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eagleman v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2016No. 20150145Published

1DissentSandstrom, Justice

[¶ 24] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 25] The majority opinion’s statute of limitations analysis is contrary to the plain and unambiguous words of- the statute:

Except as provided in subsection 3, an application for relief under this chapter must be filed within two years of the date the conviction becomes final. A conviction becomes final for purposes of this chapter when:

a. The time for appeal of the conviction to the North Dakota supreme court expires;

b. If an appeal was taken to the North Dakota supreme court, the time for petitioning the United States supreme court for review expires; or

c. If…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WetzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. WetzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. HemmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API