In re Burke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1954 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Troy.
Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moved by order to show cause dated July 1, 1991 to suspend respondent from the practice of law pending his compliance with a June 4, 1991 subpoena duces tecum requiring him to respond to a chief attorney’s inquiry and provide information concerning his handling of a client’s affairs. Respondent, in turn, tendered his resignation from the practice of law.
By decision dated September 10, 1991, we rejected…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992