Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kash v. Jewish Home & Infirmary of Rochester, N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 2009Published

1Dissent

Centra, J. (dissenting). ■

Introduction

We respectfully dissent and would affirm the order denying plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to amend the complaint by adding a cause of action under Public Health Law § 2801-d. In our view, plaintiff may not rely upon that statute because she has stated a cause of action for medical malpractice that will not be difficult to prove.

Facts

In February 2006 plaintiff became a long-term care resident of defendant Jewish Home and Infirmary of Rochester, N.Y., Inc., which is owned and operated by defendant Jewish Health Care System of Rochester, Inc.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dufel v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Hartford Insurance v. HaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Zeides v. Hebrew Home for Aged At Riverdale, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API