Kash v. Jewish Home & Infirmary of Rochester, N.Y., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Centra, J. (dissenting). ■
Introduction
We respectfully dissent and would affirm the order denying plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to amend the complaint by adding a cause of action under Public Health Law § 2801-d. In our view, plaintiff may not rely upon that statute because she has stated a cause of action for medical malpractice that will not be difficult to prove.
Facts
In February 2006 plaintiff became a long-term care resident of defendant Jewish Home and Infirmary of Rochester, N.Y., Inc., which is owned and operated by defendant Jewish Health Care System of Rochester, Inc.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dufel v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hartford Insurance v. HaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Zeides v. Hebrew Home for Aged At Riverdale, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.