Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosenberg

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 26, 2009No. 08-3373PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal, like many others we see, involves a squabble over what constitutes properly considered “relevant conduct” under the federal sentencing guidelines. Candice Rosenberg, a 60-year-old nurse practitioner working in the area around Rhinelander (Wisconsin), was charged in an 82-count indictment with prescribing a variety of controlled substances — including oxycontin, vicodin, and fentanyl — to nine people, each of whom she knew did not have a legitimate need for the medications. In other words, the indictment claimed that Rosenberg’s prescriptions were “not written…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian W. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Chube IICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Clara Rodriguez-IznagaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Gianina SimonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Jose RiosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. LugoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API