Legal Opinion
Humbert v. Ackerman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 7, 1989No. 88-1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
541 So.2d 1229 (1989)
Paul HUMBERT, Appellant,
v.
Sophie ACKERMAN, Appellee.
No. 88-1955.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 7, 1989.
Paul W. Humbert, Hollywood, in pro. per.
Peter S. Schwedock, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J. and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
The appellant, Humbert, a defendant in a personal injury action, filed his answer and affirmative defenses after an order of default was signed by the court. It is undisputed, however, that Humbert's responsive pleading was filed before the order of default was filed. We hold, and the appellee Ackerman concedes,…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. MarcheseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Garris v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
4Cited by4 opinions
- Berdeaux v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Nants v. FariaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Abelson v. First Nationwide BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Rucker v. McGriffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991