Legal Opinion

Foodcomm International v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 13, 1995No. Slip. Op. 95-202. Court No. 95-05-00734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff, Foodcomm International (“Food-comm”), moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of this Court for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts. Defendant cross-moves for summary judgment seeking an order dismissing this case.

Plaintiff challenges the denial of Protest No. 280995-100425 by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”). The issue presently before the Court is whether Customs properly classified the merchandise, fresh or chilled boneless veal from The Netherlands, as beef without bone pursuant to subheading…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North American Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  2. Toy Biz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API