Legal Opinion

Camcio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1984No. 83-290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant has failed to show reversible error in the trial court’s ruling denying his motion to suppress a post-arrest statement. See State v. Delgado-Armenta, 429 So.2d 328 (Fla.1983); Keeton v. State, 427 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the conviction on the charge of trafficking in methaqualone is hereby affirmed. The conviction and sentence on the charge of possession of methaqualone, a lesser included offense of the trafficking charge, is impermissible under the authority of Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). Therefore, the conviction is hereby reversed and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. Delgado-ArmentaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Keeton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cabo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API