Legal Opinion

Nelson Morris & Co. v. Cisler

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided July 1, 1908Published

1Opinion of the CourtBigger, J.

It is clear that the statute of limitations bars an action on this account unless the proof shows that the defendant concealed himself for such a length of time 'as that, deducting it from the whole time, it will save the action from the bar. On this the plaintiff has the burden, as it is new matter in avoidance. Lindsay v. Maxwell, 4 N. P., 354.

The defendant was not .absent from the state. Does the evidence show he concealed himself? Concealment means some affirmative act on his part which would prevent the plaintiff from discovering his whereabouts. Mere ignorance of his whereabouts is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frey v. Aultman, Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Rhoton v. MendenhallOregon Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API