Legal Opinion · Concurrence

D.S.M. v. L.M. and D.M.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 16, 2002No. 2010021Published

1ConcurrenceYates, Presiding Judge

Historically, children born outside of wedlock were treated differently under the *1144law than those born during marriage. See, e.g., Free v. Free, 507 So.2d 930 (Ala.Civ.App.l986)(noting the harshness of intestate inheritance rights as between illegitimate and legitimate children). The Legislature adopted the Alabama Uniform Parentage Act (“AUPA”) for the purpose of promoting full equality for all children, whether born during a marriage or born out of wedlock. Ex parte Presse, 554 So.2d 406 (Ala.1989). To accomplish this purpose, the AUPA sets out a procedure for establishing paternity of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. J.N.H. v. N.T.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. State ex rel. E.K.D. v. M.R.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Ritter v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API