Legal Opinion

Braxton v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order affirmed, without costs.

Memorandum: Special Term properly rejected respondents’ contention that petitioner’s designating petition was invalid because it was not numbered in compliance with subdivision 2 of section 6-134 of the Election Law. The petition contained only two pages which Special Term found were fastened together either by staple or paper clip. Under these circumstances we conclude that the perpetration of any fraud or deception was a virtual impossibility (see Matter of Rosen v McNab, 25 NY2d 798; Matter of Lawrence v Coveney, 39 AD2d 951; Matter of Reed v Power, 37 AD2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosen v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Lloyd v. PowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Reed v. PowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. Lawrence v. CoveneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bouldin v. ScaringeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Jones v. ScaringeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API