Braxton v. Mahoney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order affirmed, without costs.
Memorandum: Special Term properly rejected respondents’ contention that petitioner’s designating petition was invalid because it was not numbered in compliance with subdivision 2 of section 6-134 of the Election Law. The petition contained only two pages which Special Term found were fastened together either by staple or paper clip. Under these circumstances we conclude that the perpetration of any fraud or deception was a virtual impossibility (see Matter of Rosen v McNab, 25 NY2d 798; Matter of Lawrence v Coveney, 39 AD2d 951; Matter of Reed v Power, 37 AD2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosen v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Lloyd v. PowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Reed v. PowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Lawrence v. CoveneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bouldin v. ScaringeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Jones v. ScaringeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988