Gadsen v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Acting Chief Judge.
Christopher Gadsen challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm.
Gadsen alleged in his motion that his habitual offender sentences are illegal because his youthful offender convictions could not be used as predicate offenses *911under the habitual offender statute. The trial court properly denied this claim. See Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
In his motion, Gadsen stated that all his predicate convictions were youthful offender convictions and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Markens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- DERRELL D. HUNT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- HERBERT MC ELROY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- TOMAS S. BURGESS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002