Legal Opinion
Agnew v. Kelsey Wheel Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1915No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Ray F. Agnew against the Kelsey Wheel Company on a royalty contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action brought September 7, 1911, to recover four installments of $375 each, for royalties claimed to be due under a contract dated June 3, 1909. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the case is brought here by writ of error.
The parts of the contract material to the questions raised are:
“Whereas the party of the first part is the inventor and designer, and sole owner, of certain new and useful improvements in electrical welding apparatus, the same being described in his application for U. S. letters patent serial No. 481,172, filed March 5, 1909, and other inventions which,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griswold v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Skinner v. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hurd v. GereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Hurd v. GereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garsson v. American Diesel Engine Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942