Legal Opinion

Clark v. Helm

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1892No. 16,121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The ancestor of the appellees and the testator of the appellant, Clark, died on the 15th day of January, 1888, leaving a large estate. The testator in his will directed that the executor should convert the notes and accounts held by the testator at the time of his death into money, with which, with other money, he should equalize the shares of the respective heirs. During his lifetime the testator made the following advancements to his children: To William Helm $28,000, to Florence Cutter $24,490, to Elizabeth Patterson $24,300, and to his grandchildren the following advancements: To Nannie,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Steele v. FriersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Kyle v. ConradWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Davies v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. BernhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Lupton v. CoffelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Stimson v. RountreeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API