Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1955No. 35831PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Any remarks to the jury by the trial judge or other officer of the court not relevant to any issue in the cause which would have a tendency to coerce them into reaching their verdict constitutes reversible error. Campbell v. State, 81 Ga. App. 834 (60 S. E. 2d 169). That the statement here complained of was made by the bailiff to the jury and falsely attributed to the judge, and that its falsity was not known until after the verdict, is admitted. In Shaw v. State, 83 Ga. 92, 101 (9 S. E. 768), the jury, while deliberating their verdict, were taken to a prayer meeting where the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Gholston v. GholstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  4. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. RathbunOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Battle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. LevantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API