Chapman v. Goodnow's Administrator
Supreme Court of the United States
These were suits to recover taxes under circumstances in the main similar to those sot forth in Stryker v. Goodnow, ante, 527. The cause was argued with Stryker v. Goodnow. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
These are writs of error for the review of two judgments of the Supreme Court of Iowa — one against Richard B. Chapman, and the other against John Stryker — in suits brought by Edward K. Goodnow, assignee of the Iowa Homestead Company, in his lifetime, to recover money paid by the Homestead Company for taxes levied by the county of Webster on “Dos Monies River lands” belonging to Chapman and Stryker, respectively, for the years 1864 to 1811, both inclusive. For a statement of the general facts on which the right of recovery depends reference is made to the case of Stryker v. Crane, ante, 527.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolcott v. Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Homestead Company v. Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Chouteau v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Adams County v. Burlington & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Goodnow v. StrykerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Fox Film Corp. v. MullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Rogers v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Brooks v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.