Legal Opinion
State v. Rea
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1933No. Nos. 29,014, 29,015PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
The defendants Henry O. Rea and the Vermillion Mining Company, a lessee of Edith Oliver Rea, appeal from the judgment enforcing the royalty tax for the royalty received by defendant Edith Oliver Rea during the year 1923 for permission to explore and mine iron ore upon her fractional interest in a tract of land in St. Louis county, she having on December 19, 1923, conveyed all her right, title, and interest in such land to defendant Henry O. Rea. Defendant Edith Oliver Rea did not answer or appear in the action.
The shox*t, admitted facts are: Dux*ing 1923 defendant Edith Oliver…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lake Superior Consolidated Iron Mines v. LordSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- County of Martin v. DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. Western & Atlantic R.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Marble v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Gould v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Merle-Smith v. Minnesota Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- United States Steel Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- State v. HeskinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942