Legal Opinion
May v. Shaw
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John W. Sweeny, J.
In the petitioner’s present application for an order holding respondents in contempt for failure to abide by the provisions directing reinstatement and back pay set forth in the undersigned’s directive dated August 12, 1976 (87 Mise 2d 808, affd 58 AD2d 807), an issue has been raised concerning the applicability of the set-off provisions of section 77 of the Civil Service Law.
Section 77 provides in substance that upon reinstatement by court order, any officer who had been removed from his employment is entitled to receive back salary and compensation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fitzsimmons v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Picconi v. LoweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kaminsky v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- McGinigle v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Kaminsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- May v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Della Vecchia v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Evans v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Arbitration between City of Lackawanna & AFSCME, AFL-CIO Local Union No. 1205New York Supreme Court · 1979