Legal Opinion

People v. Reinoso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

*540Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor improperly used racial stereotypes in his summation is unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Seldon, 128 AD2d 742). Were we to review this claim in the interest of justice, we would find it to be without merit.

Defendant’s remaining arguments, that the court improperly invited the jury to take notes, and that a jury note received mid-trial indicated that premature deliberations had taken place, are similarly unpreserved. Nor does either claim have merit. Nothing in the record indicates that any notes were ever taken (People v Elias,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SeldonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. EliasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API