Legal Opinion
State v. Rice
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Was the court’s limitation of defendant’s examination of the expert witnesses prejudicial error?
2. Was a remark by the court in ruling on an objection prejudicial to defendant’s case?
In cross-examining Dr. Holt the defendant’s counsel asked:
“Q. Let me ask you this. If when the body was brought in you had been given a history from the Coroner or somebody to the effect that this man had suffered several injuries or blows to the head, within the immediate period, prior to his death, what would have been your performing of autopsy under that kind of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oseman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Rausch v. BuisseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bucher v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Dreher v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Staples v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- McBirney v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Rice v. WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.