Legal Opinion

Meuse v. Stults

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 22, 2006No. CIV.A. 04-10255-EFHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Rosalyn Stults’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to the claims of Plaintiff Brian Meuse. Of the thirteen counts listed in Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, only the first three are pertinent to the instant motion. Counts one and two are brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Count three is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3). Count four, though a federal claim, does not name Stults as a defendant. The remaining counts (five through thirteen) all concern state law claims. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. MannDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
  2. Dubose v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  3. Meuse v. FreehDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API