Legal Opinion
Ahamed v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2006No. 03-71594; Agency Nos. A75 528 042, A76 715 392, A76 715 393Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM***
Didar, Monika, and Dishamoni Ahamed, natives of Bangledesh, appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s decision for substantial evidence, and may reverse the BIA’s decision only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Xiaoguang Gu v. Gonzales, 429 F.3d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.2005). Because the BIA affirmed without opinion, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2252, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3751 Saideh Fisher, AKA Saideh Hassib-Tehrani Kian Hosseini Lavasani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lucio Ricardo Alvarez-Santos, AKA Luciano Ricardo Alvarez AKA Lucio Ricardo Alvarez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Michelle Thomas David George Thomas Tyneal Michelle Thomas Shaldon Waide Thomas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ernesto Adolfo Recinos De Leon v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Xiaoguang Gu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005