Legal Opinion

Karr v. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1953No. 38581PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.

This is a claim under Section 8 (c) and (21) of the Mississippi AVorkmen’s Compensation Act, Chapter 354, General Laws of Mississippi 1948, amended by Chapter 412, Laws of Mississippi 1950.

It arises under these circumstances: On April 27, 1950, Karr, the appellant, was, and for a number of years prior thereto had been, an employee of appellee, Armstrong Tire & Rubber Company. On said date he was a welder’s helper. He and one AVelch were endeavoring to repair a hydraulic pump. They were cutting an oil pipe connected to the pump, using for that purpose an electric torch. Oil escaped from the…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. Spann v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. General Elec. Co. v. McKinnonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. KLLM, Inc. v. FowlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Gregg v. Natchez Trace Electric Power Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Smith v. Container General Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API