Legal Opinion
Schutte v. Rosenblum
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.
Motion by defendant Crystal to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
The complaint charges a conspiracy and alleges in substance as follows: That in November, 1955 defendant Schlanger owned a grocery super market which he transferred to a corporation known as Neubauer & Schlanger, Inc.; that the defendant Rosenblum owned the building in which the business was located; that in November, 1954 defendant Schlanger executed a chattel mortgage to defendant Rosenblum upon the fixtures and equipment of the said business; that in April, 1956, prior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. KlawNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1907
- Mariner Harbor National Bank v. Imperial Beverage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Purofied Down Products Corp. v. National Ass'n of Bedding ManufacturersNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Lafayette Lumber Co. v. SelvesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- 348-352 West 27th Street Corp. v. DropkinNew York Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Toole v. Karnani (In Re Trinsum Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Reid v. Wolf (In re Wolf)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Aluminum Supply Co. v. CamelioNew York Supreme Court · 1962