Legal Opinion
Bizzelle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 4, 1938No. 19696PublishedCited by 12 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Krueger, Judge.
The conviction is for operating a modern school of beauty culture without having the same at all times under the direct supervision of a registered hairdresser or cosmetologist. The punishment, a fine of $5.00.
This prosecution is based on Section 2 of Chapter 116, Acts of the Forty-fourth Legislature, which reads as follows: “That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to operate a beauty shop or beauty school within the State, unless such shop or school is at all times under the direct supervision of a registered hairdresser or cosmetologist.”
The testimony…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Beddall v. LonctotWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Doyle v. Board of Barber ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Brown v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Salazar v. McGinnUtah Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.