State on Behalf of Elsasser v. Fox
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hannon, Judge.
Chad R. Fox appeals from the order of the district court increasing his child support obligation for Camden J. Elsasser, arguing that the court erred in not deducting the monthly payment he is required to make on his student loan from his net monthly income in computing his obligation. We find that the court did not include a basic income and support calculation and wrongly ignored evidence of the income of Camden’s mother, Dawn Elsasser. Moreover, we conclude that the court erred in failing to allow a deduction for Chad’s monthly student loan payments. Accordingly, we affirm as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phelps v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Smith-Helstrom v. YonkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Baratta v. BarattaNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Brandt v. BrandtNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Druba v. DrubaNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gallner v. HoffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Sears v. LarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Rutherford v. RutherfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- ERICA J. v. DewittNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Roper v. JohnsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.