Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Rushton (In Re Armstrong)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 9, 2003No. BAP No. UT-02-012. Bankruptcy No. 00B-26592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MCFEELEY, Chief Judge.

Donald E. Armstrong (“Armstrong”) appeals an Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah that temporarily allowed a claim by Appellee Steven R. Bailey, Chapter 7 Trustee for Willow Brook Cottages, LLC (“Bailey”), which permitted Bailey to vote on Armstrong’s Chapter 11 Plan. Armstrong argues that the Estimation Order erred in calculating the disputed claim, violated the due process rights of some interested parties, and was invalid because of bias. We affirm.

I. Background

On March 19, 1998, Willow Brook Cottages, L.L.C. (“Willow Brook”)…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Rushton (In Re Armstrong)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. In re Experient Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  3. In Re: Henry L. KleinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Jubber v. Sleater (In Re Bedrock Marketing, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2009
  5. Offer Space, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API